Jesuz... it's not "my problems"... tell it to TaZ, he's the one who thinks they're a better team OMG!
and YES! pcws means alot! Why? Have you seen the match, or demo to judge who played better? Are you a tactician that makes you tell who played better? The score does not fully show the true superiority... eg. one good thrown flash is worth more than your 3 frags for the bomb. Think of the fight between Nikolay Valuev and Evander Holyfield. Who was better? and who won the fight?
that was not the point i was making... i ment online is a little more random unlike lan but oh well i guess, its to hard for you to see that teams practice new tactics, learn new things in pcws and then use wot they have learned in an offical, i give up trying to educate you but end of the day my delusional friend, the scores speak for themselves.
fnatic > wicked
it was a nice debate until u shown me how narrow minded you are.
HAHAHAHA you're more hilarious than I thought! :D Do you actually understood what you just said? Sentence: "teams practice new tactics, learn new things in pcws and then use wot they have learned in an offical" shows that you're more retarded than Corky Tacher! You're even more retarded than yourself! :D How can fnatic learn some things playing with Wicked, and than use it as "new" playing with them in officials? HAHAHA omg!! :D and you want to educate me... HAHAHAHA finish your kindergarden first! But the funnyes thing is that you are certain that they used new things, and you act as if you were specialist... have you even seen the demo, or the match itself? OR BETTER QUESTION: how long do you play counter-strike, to know which tactics are new? DAMN have you ever playd CS in a clan to know how hard it is to make a new surprising tactic? Well in my opinion you're a newbie who don't know shit about CS... and now I'm certain!
Well, let's end this discussion.. ONLINE is pretty random > that's a point GothiaL got right on!
Fnatic and Wicked playing eachother is probably to study tactics and find counter-tactics, it doesn't rly matter who loses or wins, because they are probably training a certain tactic, you can only learn a tactic by doing it over and over again, and if that means that you lose rounds over and over again so be it, but in the end it's all about the big tournaments.. The time to measure with eachother is in a tournament, because you got alot of extra factors that you don't have when playing Online! They all trained for the big tournaments! And yes I saw the match, Fnatic was on fire.. No other team could've stopped them probably, but yea Wicked has potential.. They could be potential winners and that doesn't exclude SK or mTw or any other of the top teams right now, they are all potential winners! There's alot of factors you gotta take in count too, the environment, the adrenaline you get, cheers from the public, etc! The top teams are rly close together skill wise, they are all good!
Well, SK has a good chance, I think there are few competing at the top right now, and that would be mTw together with Wicked, SK and fnatic! ;) So let's see what the next tournament brings!
nice, that you only show 1 map result ;) ok lets look at other results. in that bo3 fnatic won first map 16-5. at eswc Cheonan fnatic beat mym 16-12. and also there sk destroyed wicked http://www.sk-gaming.com/match/17907
so in the last two tournaments fnatic ad sk placed 1st and 2nd where as wicked placed 3rd and 9-16th( poor seedings though) now besides that 1 game where wicked took fnatic who had alrdy won first map into overtime, can you tell me any other evidence that wicked are better?
and YES! pcws means alot! Why? Have you seen the match, or demo to judge who played better? Are you a tactician that makes you tell who played better? The score does not fully show the true superiority... eg. one good thrown flash is worth more than your 3 frags for the bomb. Think of the fight between Nikolay Valuev and Evander Holyfield. Who was better? and who won the fight?
heres another important word about wicked beating fnatic in pcws: ONLINE
fnatic > wicked
it was a nice debate until u shown me how narrow minded you are.
Fnatic and Wicked playing eachother is probably to study tactics and find counter-tactics, it doesn't rly matter who loses or wins, because they are probably training a certain tactic, you can only learn a tactic by doing it over and over again, and if that means that you lose rounds over and over again so be it, but in the end it's all about the big tournaments.. The time to measure with eachother is in a tournament, because you got alot of extra factors that you don't have when playing Online! They all trained for the big tournaments! And yes I saw the match, Fnatic was on fire.. No other team could've stopped them probably, but yea Wicked has potential.. They could be potential winners and that doesn't exclude SK or mTw or any other of the top teams right now, they are all potential winners! There's alot of factors you gotta take in count too, the environment, the adrenaline you get, cheers from the public, etc! The top teams are rly close together skill wise, they are all good!
WICKED are a better team.
"lamusy w finale"* ;D yea that was good ; D i hate this punks from fnatic ; ))))
so in the last two tournaments fnatic ad sk placed 1st and 2nd where as wicked placed 3rd and 9-16th( poor seedings though) now besides that 1 game where wicked took fnatic who had alrdy won first map into overtime, can you tell me any other evidence that wicked are better?
i didnt think so.