defcom

Belgium!


Drink
cola
Food
cornflakes
Movie
saw
Music
underground
Person
teddybeer
Player
player is mijne favo ni! zotteke
Game
N.itendo E.ntertainment S.ystem
Car
nen twingoooo

a lil munchkin kiss of respect to:

xrxjah // twistjah // inter // Mystery // ense
wittekop // riza // flexo & angeldustj // heat // onliner
druxz // doran // kimmy // bth // C'mii // Mister P
bida // chilmus // jane // gnR // tmd // kenshin

----------------------------------------------------

What do people know?

The last question that will be dealt with is the question of what people know. At the heart of this area of study is skepticism, with many approaches involved trying to disprove some particular form of it.

Philosophical skepticism

Skepticism is related to the question of whether certain knowledge is possible. Skeptics argue that the belief in something does not necessarily justify an assertion of knowledge of it. In this skeptics oppose foundationalism, which states that there have to be some basic beliefs that are justified without reference to others. The skeptical response to this can take several approaches. First, claiming that "basic beliefs" must exist, amounts to the logical fallacy of argument from ignorance combined with the slippery slope. While a foundationalist would use Münchhausen Trilemma as a justification for demanding the validity of basic beliefs, a skeptic would see no problem with admitting the result.

Fallibilism

For most of philosophical history, "knowledge" was taken to mean belief that was true and justified to an absolute certainty.[citation needed] Early in the 20th century, however, the notion that belief had to be justified as such to count as knowledge lost favour. Fallibilism is the view that knowing something does not entail certainty regarding it.