ye, that was very good bo3, specially game 3

this one was for legendarywhatever

Im meaning exactly what I say. The balance board has leaned far too long enough at the Orc's side so I think its no more than right for them to finally get back some critics. Orc has ALWAYS been superior to this Undead, since ages.

"since ages" comes from 1.21 player, you didnt know even old patch logs, how was the game evolving etc. how was sweet capable to got 8-0 vs orc on some chineese tournament, how crazy played fov back then with ghouls vs blademaster and sucesfully, how was undead capable of winning 30 pop vs 80 pop thanks to coilnova and people like you was still bitching about imbalance, how hard is to play undead, how is orc overpowered, even when undeads was totally dominating elfs and humans with air, got two really strong match ups and they still whined a lot
you know why ted isnt advancing to the finals ? grubby lured him to tight spot and stomped really well, that was teds fault, not case of the imbalance, and still grubby nearly lost it, even when he doesnt make mistake .. he just didnt make a little one mistake and nearly lost with expo, that is what? its not imbalance ?
even when two top orcs didnt advance from their groupstage, even when ted beat lyn twice and nearly beat grubby too in close series, you still talking about some orc imbalance? i havent seen any orc imbalance, you did? where ?

cimo, are you honestly arguing that orc vs ud is not imbalanced?

explain then why over the course of 1800+ games, the orc has a winning percent of 60? Do you realize how huge that number is?

In a best of 3, with the orc winning at 60%, what are the undead's chances of winning 2 games? 28.8%

In a tournament, what if i have to play 2 orcs in 2 seperate bo3s? odds are 8.2%

This is why we dont see undeads winning anything. because you win one orc, ok, but you have to face another one next.