You are here: Home / Forums / Counter-Strike / 2 teams if they faced each others then its a destruction....
TOPIC
« Previous1Next »
2 teams if they faced each others then its a destruction....
type 2 teams that if they played against each other would be a very close match and its very hard to bet?
in the old times i beleive attax vs roccat always had a close match it ended up 16 14 at nuke eswc 2007
3d vs sk at cpl 2005 nuke
fnatic vs estro eswc 2008 nuke
guess most of the tight games are at nuke xD
which force me to ask another question :
what map do you think can have the most tight matchs ?
in the old times i beleive attax vs roccat always had a close match it ended up 16 14 at nuke eswc 2007
3d vs sk at cpl 2005 nuke
fnatic vs estro eswc 2008 nuke
guess most of the tight games are at nuke xD
which force me to ask another question :
what map do you think can have the most tight matchs ?
since no 1 likes u and your threads i would like to be the first who post
i believe inferno is the most tight map for close matchs ^^
i believe inferno is the most tight map for close matchs ^^
danil0 wrote:
fnaticMSI vs MYM @ dubai de_train close game...it was this year or the last one ?
eolithic vs mYm/mousesports/sk/fnatic/mtw/pgs
Pzyclone wrote:
eolithic vs mYm/mousesports/sk/fnatic/mtw/pgseolithic didn't have tight matches,they dominated everything
chns wrote:
Pzyclone wrote:
eolithic vs mYm/mousesports/sk/fnatic/mtw/pgseolithic didn't have tight matches,they dominated everything
eolitic used to have amazing players such as dark ...
eolithic vs. legendarySk vs. TAMM
all three were nearly unbeaten.
But TAMM was far to early and CS wasnt on the level it was lateron.
Eventhough they were unbeaten :D
all three were nearly unbeaten.
But TAMM was far to early and CS wasnt on the level it was lateron.
Eventhough they were unbeaten :D
aqu4rius wrote:
eolitic used to have amazing players such as dark ...Pzyclone wrote:
aqu4rius wrote:
eolitic used to have amazing players such as dark ...true
« Previous1Next »





