You are here: Home / Forums / Warcraft III / Why viOlet classes himself as the Currently Best Player
TOPIC
« Previous1Next »
Why viOlet classes himself as the Currently Best Player
http://tft.replayers.com/download.php?id=138473&t=1259514254
4 Claw Dropped + 1 tome of XP. Epicness revealed
4 Claw Dropped + 1 tome of XP. Epicness revealed
I don't think he every titled himself "currently best player".
Without a doubt EG is the team with the most annoying whining no skill orc player in wc3 history namely 'Ciara'. If there is any such thing as a "Worst player award" or competition, I see him first.
He proves that even playing orc requires a tiny bit of skill, and that's why he keeps failing. My regards to Team EG who seem to like white trash.
Without a doubt EG is the team with the most annoying whining no skill orc player in wc3 history namely 'Ciara'. If there is any such thing as a "Worst player award" or competition, I see him first.
He proves that even playing orc requires a tiny bit of skill, and that's why he keeps failing. My regards to Team EG who seem to like white trash.
Thaison_Gay wrote:
I don't think he every titled himself "currently best player".Without a doubt EG is the team with the most annoying whining no skill orc player in wc3 history namely 'Ciara'. If there is any such thing as a "Worst player award" or competition, I see him first.
He proves that even playing orc requires a tiny bit of skill, and that's why he keeps failing. My regards to Team EG who seem to like white trash.
Maybe not ''currently best player'',but he did say he was one of the most talented players :D
Grubby: go fs vs fs?
Violet:sory
:D
Violet:sory
:D
gwt_ds_carw wrote:
Grubby: go fs vs fs?Violet:sory
:D
I will translate violet's words for you
Violet:Ops, I shitted my pants :x
While I was watching the game,I couldn't shake the feeling that smth was wrong.I knew violet didn't get his claws from the first camp(ogre,2xtroll trapper) or the ogre mage in the middle.Where did the 4 claws +6 come from?
The answer is that only 2 of those claws dropped,and the other 2 were purchased at the merchant.Imba?
The answer is that only 2 of those claws dropped,and the other 2 were purchased at the merchant.Imba?
gwt_ds_carw wrote:
While I was watching the game,I couldn't shake the feeling that smth was wrong.I knew violet didn't get his claws from the first camp(ogre,2xtroll trapper) or the ogre mage in the middle.Where did the 4 claws +6 come from?The answer is that only 2 of those claws dropped,and the other 2 were purchased at the merchant.Imba?
Doesnt really matter. The question here is. Why does blizzard support a game that seem to base a lot of what it takes to win a match on items. In other match ups it hardly differes but its precisely when there's an Orc (BM) involved where it starts to make a different. Its mainly based on BM being the only hero in the game that can boost up one of its abilities with help of items, and therefor create and output an imbalanced amount of damage. This should've never occured.
LegendaryLover wrote:
gwt_ds_carw wrote:
While I was watching the game,I couldn't shake the feeling that smth was wrong.I knew violet didn't get his claws from the first camp(ogre,2xtroll trapper) or the ogre mage in the middle.Where did the 4 claws +6 come from?The answer is that only 2 of those claws dropped,and the other 2 were purchased at the merchant.Imba?
Doesnt really matter. The question here is. Why does blizzard support a game that seem to base a lot of what it takes to win a match on items. In other match ups it hardly differes but its precisely when there's an Orc (BM) involved where it starts to make a different. Its mainly based on BM being the only hero in the game that can boost up one of its abilities with help of items, and therefor create and output an imbalanced amount of damage. This should've never occured.
Indeed...this is where real imbalance lies.I remember SL match between Fly and FoV,and the only logical conclusios is that UD would have been THE strongest (not imba) race in w3 if there wasnt for that green bastard.Besides,these were fun,innovative,creative and exciting games where orc are actually forced to give 110 % of their abilities in order to beat UD and not nowdays where anyone with just little hard training can become at least very good semi pro player playing orc.I am not saying that Lyn,Fly,Grubby etc etc arent great players...they are,e.g. Grubby won nearly everything before infamous BM imbalance...but sometimes it just questionable would they be as good as now if there wasnt for BM?
ThomasK wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
Indeed...this is where real imbalance lies.I remember SL match between Fly and FoV,and the only logical conclusios is that UD would have been THE strongest (not imba) race in w3 if there wasnt for that green bastard.Besides,these were fun,innovative,creative and exciting games where orc are actually forced to give 110 % of their abilities in order to beat UD and not nowdays where anyone with just little hard training can become at least very good semi pro player playing orc.I am not saying that Lyn,Fly,Grubby etc etc arent great players...they are,e.g. Grubby won nearly everything before infamous BM imbalance...but sometimes it just questionable would they be as good as now if there wasnt for BM?
Sorry, but orcs were already dominating undeads, when they didn't even play bm first.
Indeed?Then we arent pointing at the same game
ThomasK wrote:
Sorry, but orcs were already dominating undeads, when they didn't even play bm first.
I've been following the wc3 and playing the game for a long time.All I can say is that I don't remember it that way
gwt_ds_carw wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Sorry, but orcs were already dominating undeads, when they didn't even play bm first.
I've been following the wc3 scene and playing the game for a long time.All I can say is that I don't remember it that way
ThomasK wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
Indeed...this is where real imbalance lies.I remember SL match between Fly and FoV,and the only logical conclusios is that UD would have been THE strongest (not imba) race in w3 if there wasnt for that green bastard.Besides,these were fun,innovative,creative and exciting games where orc are actually forced to give 110 % of their abilities in order to beat UD and not nowdays where anyone with just little hard training can become at least very good semi pro player playing orc.I am not saying that Lyn,Fly,Grubby etc etc arent great players...they are,e.g. Grubby won nearly everything before infamous BM imbalance...but sometimes it just questionable would they be as good as now if there wasnt for BM?
Sorry, but orcs were already dominating undeads, when they didn't even play bm first.
Indeed?Then we arent pointing at the same game
Do you play wc3 since one month?
Are you retarded?
Orc>ud has been like this for very long time and ThomasK is absolutely right that it was imba even before they started using BM at all. Back in 2005, Grubby used to say that european UDs are just funny to play against and that korean UDs are the only ones giving him competition, but still not hard to win.
So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
Damned_ wrote:
Orc>ud has been like this for very long time and ThomasK is absolutely right that it was imba even before they started using BM at all. Back in 2005, Grubby used to say that european UDs are just funny to play against and that korean UDs are the only ones giving him competition, but still not hard to win.So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
...BM is by far not the main problem in this MU...this i s where you fail retard...compare % of wins of Orcs vs UD before and after "discovering" the BM and everything will be clear to you...and you are calling ME noob...bwahahahah
StarStalker wrote:
Damned_ wrote:
Orc>ud has been like this for very long time and ThomasK is absolutely right that it was imba even before they started using BM at all. Back in 2005, Grubby used to say that european UDs are just funny to play against and that korean UDs are the only ones giving him competition, but still not hard to win.So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
...BM is by far not the main problem in this MU...this i s where you fail retard...compare % of wins of Orcs vs UD before and after "discovering" the BM and everything will be clear to you...and you are calling ME noob...bwahahahah
You are the noob. Orc has been owning Undead ever since the destroyer bug got fixed. That was in 1.16(?)
Guess why Madfrog retired, not because of Blademaster but because of Orc.
Always the same morons saying "it's only the Blademaster". Ud can't counter Orc air properly and they can't stop the tier2 expo. It's been like that forever.
StarStalker wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
Indeed...this is where real imbalan[...] BM?
Sorry, but orcs were already dominating undeads, when they didn't even play bm first.
Indeed?Then we arent pointing at the same game
Do you play wc3 since one month?
Are you retarded?
FS + TC stomp + Chain is right there with hex + Mr right click, and was abused since the dawn of times.
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
Damned_ wrote:
Orc>ud has been like this for very long time and ThomasK is absolutely right that it was imba even before they started using BM at all. Back in 2005, Grubby used to say that european UDs are just funny to play against and that korean UDs are the only ones giving him competition, but still not hard to win.So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
...BM is by far not the main problem in this MU...this i s where you fail retard...compare % of wins of Orcs vs UD before and after "discovering" the BM and everything will be clear to you...and you are calling ME noob...bwahahahah
You are the noob. Orc has been owning Undead ever since the destroyer bug got fixed. That was in 1.16(?)
Guess why Madfrog retired, not because of Blademaster but because of Orc.
Always the same morons saying "it's only the Blademaster". Ud can't counter Orc air properly and they can't stop the tier2 expo. It's been like that forever.
Let me ask you smthg Mr.FailPlayer:was the ratio of Orc wins at the same level then as it is today?Was TC + FS + air as imbalanced vs UD as Blade is today?Cause I saw many replays in the past where Orc vs UD was quite balanced MU,at least more balanced than todays shit of MU where e.g. Space,one of the best UD out there has like 40 % wins over orcs...was it like that before Blademaster?Enlight me please...
StarStalker wrote:
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
Damned_ wrote:
Orc>ud has been like this for very long time and ThomasK is absolutely right that it was imba even before they started using BM at all. Back in 2005, Grubby used to say that european UDs are just funny to play against and that korean UDs are the only ones giving him competition, but still not hard to win.So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
...BM is by far not the main problem in this MU...this i s where you fail retard...compare % of wins of Orcs vs UD before and after "discovering" the BM and everything will be clear to you...and you are calling ME noob...bwahahahah
You are the noob. Orc has been owning Undead ever since the destroyer bug got fixed. That was in 1.16(?)
Guess why Madfrog retired, not because of Blademaster but because of Orc.
Always the same morons saying "it's only the Blademaster". Ud can't counter Orc air properly and they can't stop the tier2 expo. It's been like that forever.
Let me ask you smthg Mr.FailPlayer:was the ratio of Orc wins at the same level then as it is today?Was TC + FS + air as imbalanced vs UD as Blade is today?Cause I saw many replays in the past where Orc vs UD was quite balanced MU,at least more balanced than todays shit of MU where e.g. Space,one of the best UD out there has like 40 % wins over orcs...was it like that before Blademaster?Enlight me please...
At the very top level it was maybe even more imbalanced than today, until Luci countered with lich frost armor first (orc would often pick fights early t2). I guess you can argue based on %s etc, but the point is this MU was sightly in orc's favor since 1.16 or something, and blade became really strong because of lvl2 consumable items drop switched to permanents in 1.18. And anyway, orc would most often go grunt raiders kodo(s) with FS TC, not air as you said.
[QUOTE] The question here is. Why does blizzard support a game that seem to base a lot of what it takes to win a match on items.
Uh, they don't? Unless you were talking about WoW. A properly supported game would have seen a BM nerf months/years ago.
WTH^ o_O
partner0 wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
Damned_ wrote:
Orc>ud has been like this for very long time and ThomasK is absolutely right that it was imba even before they started using BM at all. Back in 2005, Grubby used to say that european UDs are just funny to play against and that korean UDs are the only ones giving him competition, but still not hard to win.So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
...BM is by far not the main problem in this MU...this i s where you fail retard...compare % of wins of Orcs vs UD before and after "discovering" the BM and everything will be clear to you...and you are calling ME noob...bwahahahah
You are the noob. Orc has been owning Undead ever since the destroyer bug got fixed. That was in 1.16(?)
Guess why Madfrog retired, not because of Blademaster but because of Orc.
Always the same morons saying "it's only the Blademaster". Ud can't counter Orc air properly and they can't stop the tier2 expo. It's been like that forever.
Let me ask you smthg Mr.FailPlayer:was the ratio of Orc wins at the same level then as it is today?Was TC + FS + air as imbalanced vs UD as Blade is today?Cause I saw many replays in the past where Orc vs UD was quite balanced MU,at least more balanced than todays shit of MU where e.g. Space,one of the best UD out there has like 40 % wins over orcs...was it like that before Blademaster?Enlight me please...
At the very top level it was maybe even more imbalanced than today, until Luci countered with lich frost armor first (orc would often pick fights early t2). I guess you can argue based on %s etc, but the point is this MU was sightly in orc's favor since 1.16 or something, and blade became really strong because of lvl2 consumable items drop switched to permanents in 1.18. And anyway, orc would most often go grunt raiders kodo(s) with FS TC, not air as you said.
True.In fact that was my point all the way.In past,that MU was clearly more balanced than it is today and I cant understand how anyone can claim that it was imba then as it is today.Today Orc vs UD is almost predictable as the fact that tomorrow is coming.I mentioned air just to answer FunPlayers statment.
StarStalker wrote:
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
Damned_ wrote:
Orc>ud has been like this for very long time and ThomasK is absolutely right that it was imba even before they started using BM at all. Back in 2005, Grubby used to say that european UDs are just funny to play against and that korean UDs are the only ones giving him competition, but still not hard to win.So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
...BM is by far not the main problem in this MU...this i s where you fail retard...compare % of wins of Orcs vs UD before and after "discovering" the BM and everything will be clear to you...and you are calling ME noob...bwahahahah
You are the noob. Orc has been owning Undead ever since the destroyer bug got fixed. That was in 1.16(?)
Guess why Madfrog retired, not because of Blademaster but because of Orc.
Always the same morons saying "it's only the Blademaster". Ud can't counter Orc air properly and they can't stop the tier2 expo. It's been like that forever.
Let me ask you smthg Mr.FailPlayer:was the ratio of Orc wins at the same level then as it is today?Was TC + FS + air as imbalanced vs UD as Blade is today?Cause I saw many replays in the past where Orc vs UD was quite balanced MU,at least more balanced than todays shit of MU where e.g. Space,one of the best UD out there has like 40 % wins over orcs...was it like that before Blademaster?Enlight me please...
Show us these numbers then. You surely would have already if you had them. As partner0 said, if anything with TED Undead fares "better" vs orc today as they did back then, whatever it's worth.
First of all,before,orcs played grunt/raider/kodo much more often than air.Second of all,it was NEVER more imbalanced than it is today.How many UD's have retired recently?What win percentage have the UD's had since the advent of BM abuse?How many tournaments has an UD player won since the BM crap had started?Please,restrain yourselves from saying stuff that can be refuted just by facts without any knowledge of the game whatsoever.
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
Damned_ wrote:
Orc>ud has been like this for very long time and ThomasK is absolutely right that it was imba even before they started using BM at all. Back in 2005, Grubby used to say that european UDs are just funny to play against and that korean UDs are the only ones giving him competition, but still not hard to win.So, I don't know for how long do you play or follow wc3, but ur knowledge of the game is totally noob and BM is by far not the main problem in this match up, cuz usually orc has no problem in dealing up with UD army (unlike vs NE and H), but BM just increase the % for orc
...BM is by far not the main problem in this MU...this i s where you fail retard...compare % of wins of Orcs vs UD before and after "discovering" the BM and everything will be clear to you...and you are calling ME noob...bwahahahah
You are the noob. Orc has been owning Undead ever since the destroyer bug got fixed. That was in 1.16(?)
Guess why Madfrog retired, not because of Blademaster but because of Orc.
Always the same morons saying "it's only the Blademaster". Ud can't counter Orc air properly and they can't stop the tier2 expo. It's been like that forever.
Let me ask you smthg Mr.FailPlayer:was the ratio of Orc wins at the same level then as it is today?Was TC + FS + air as imbalanced vs UD as Blade is today?Cause I saw many replays in the past where Orc vs UD was quite balanced MU,at least more balanced than todays shit of MU where e.g. Space,one of the best UD out there has like 40 % wins over orcs...was it like that before Blademaster?Enlight me please...
Show us these numbers then. You surely would have already if you had them. As partner0 said, if anything with TED Undead fares "better" vs orc today as they did back then, whatever it's worth.
I dont need to show you anything,its a matter of common sense.Take Lucifer for example,you can count on you fingers MU he won vs Orcs in Blademasters era.Then go in past and remember all the matches vs Grubby,Zacard etc etc where he won 300% more games than in times where BM abusers simply crushed him,even low skill opponents.You mentioned Frog retiring...So what?Luci,Susi,FoV etc etc retired you know why?I think you do.
StarStalker wrote:
I dont need to show you anything,its a matter of common sense.Take Lucifer for example,you can count on you fingers MU he won vs Orcs in Blademasters era.Then go in past and remember all the matches vs Grubby,Zacard etc etc where he won 300% more games than in times where BM abusers simply crushed him,even low skill opponents.You mentioned Frog retiring...So what?Luci,Susi,FoV etc etc retired you know why?I think you do.Uh, so you talk about numbers but you don't have to show anything eh? Yeah, it's really a matter of common sense then. Sorry that I don't take you seriously.
Ud got raped hard by Farseer/TC back when they played ghuls. You could argue going fiends helped them a little until Blademaster made things worse again. But that doesn't change that Orc pwned Ud way before Blademaster became the standard first hero.
so you mention Undeads retiring because of orc.... I mention THE Undead retiring because of orc. Ah wait, I was the one saying orc > Ud, no matter when, it just didn't change in all those years. Back when Ud won something like ESWC it was pre-1.15 or they didn't have to play vs Orcs like Lucifer in 2006.
Sweet beating Grubby in Bnet finals was THE upset in that era, you know?
Hell, how much imbalance does it take for Orctards to see the stupidity of their race when Madfrog loses to Grubby even with bugged destroyers...
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
I dont need to show you anything,its a matter of common sense.Take Lucifer for example,you can count on you fingers MU he won vs Orcs in Blademasters era.Then go in past and remember all the matches vs Grubby,Zacard etc etc where he won 300% more games than in times where BM abusers simply crushed him,even low skill opponents.You mentioned Frog retiring...So what?Luci,Susi,FoV etc etc retired you know why?I think you do.Uh, so you talk about numbers but you don't have to show anything eh? Yeah, it's really a matter of common sense then. Sorry that I don't take you seriously.
Ud got raped hard by Farseer/TC back when they played ghuls. You could argue going fiends helped them a little until Blademaster made things worse again. But that doesn't change that Orc pwned Ud way before Blademaster became the standard first hero.
so you mention Undeads retiring because of orc.... I mention THE Undead retiring because of orc. Ah wait, I was the one saying orc > Ud, no matter when, it just didn't change in all those years. Back when Ud won something like ESWC it was pre-1.15 or they didn't have to play vs Orcs like Lucifer in 2006.
Sweet beating Grubby in Bnet finals was THE upset in that era, you know?
Hell, how much imbalance does it take for Orctards to see the stupidity of their race when Madfrog loses to Grubby even with bugged destroyers...
You are simply making no sense at all."...it just didn't change in all those years.." this is where I strongly disagree with you.It did change,but in negative kind of way fo UD.Thats all,thats the conclusion of everything Ive been trying to tell.I rest my case,no one can convince me that Orcs were imba vs UD before BM in a same intenisty as they are now.Just look at game in SL I was mentioning.FoV won vs an orc after what?3 years and I can bet its all because Fly didnt go BM.If he did,he would have crushed him.
StarStalker wrote:
You are simply making no sense at all."...it just didn't change in all those years.." this is where I strongly disagree with you.It did change,but in negative kind of way fo UD.Thats all,thats the conclusion of everything Ive been trying to tell.I rest my case,no one can convince me that Orcs were imba vs UD before BM in a same intenisty as they are now.Just look at game in SL I was mentioning.FoV won vs an orc after what?3 years and I can bet its all because Fly didnt go BM.If he did,he would have crushed him.That's the problem, you act like there's a difference if Orc wins 60% vs Ud now with Blademaster or 58% with Farseer back in the days.
But good job removing all doubt that you're a clueless noob, using games of FlyOnline0% as "proof".
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
You are simply making no sense at all."...it just didn't change in all those years.." this is where I strongly disagree with you.It did change,but in negative kind of way fo UD.Thats all,thats the conclusion of everything Ive been trying to tell.I rest my case,no one can convince me that Orcs were imba vs UD before BM in a same intenisty as they are now.Just look at game in SL I was mentioning.FoV won vs an orc after what?3 years and I can bet its all because Fly didnt go BM.If he did,he would have crushed him.That's the problem, you act like there's a difference if Orc wins 60% vs Ud now with Blademaster or 58% with Farseer back in the days.
But good job removing all doubt that you're a clueless noob, using games of FlyOnline0% as "proof".
...and this shows that you are ignorant,arrogant ,clueless moron since 40% indeed isnt equal to 60% and since both FoV and Fly were in Chine at the time of the match with equal ping and equal conditions...no words needed anymore
StarStalker wrote:
...and this shows that you are ignorant,arrogant ,clueless moron since 40% indeed isnt equal to 60% and since both FoV and Fly were in Chine at the time of the match with equal ping and equal conditions...no words needed anymoreI dont know where "Chine" is (unless embed french words into English sentences) but neither of these player were there. Fly was in China, while FoV was in Korea.
partner0 wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
...and this shows that you are ignorant,arrogant ,clueless moron since 40% indeed isnt equal to 60% and since both FoV and Fly were in Chine at the time of the match with equal ping and equal conditions...no words needed anymoreI dont know where "Chine" is (unless embed french words into English sentences) but neither of these player were there. Fly was in China, while FoV was in Korea.
Sorry,Ive made a mistake,its China...nope,Im pretty sure they were both in China according to host and specs
StarStalker wrote:
partner0 wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
...and this shows that you are ignorant,arrogant ,clueless moron since 40% indeed isnt equal to 60% and since both FoV and Fly were in Chine at the time of the match with equal ping and equal conditions...no words needed anymoreI dont know where "Chine" is (unless embed french words into English sentences) but neither of these player were there. Fly was in China, while FoV was in Korea.
Sorry,Ive made a mistake,its China...nope,Im pretty sure they were both in China according to host and specs
They maybe had a good host, but that doesn't change that Fly loses almost all of his online games. It's only natural, the best players of their time have a habit of losing online matches all the time, was the same with moon and sky.
Which only means you got no point and no clue. 40%, 60% do you even understand what I said?
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
partner0 wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
...and this shows that you are ignorant,arrogant ,clueless moron since 40% indeed isnt equal to 60% and since both FoV and Fly were in Chine at the time of the match with equal ping and equal conditions...no words needed anymoreI dont know where "Chine" is (unless embed french words into English sentences) but neither of these player were there. Fly was in China, while FoV was in Korea.
Sorry,Ive made a mistake,its China...nope,Im pretty sure they were both in China according to host and specs
They maybe had a good host, but that doesn't change that Fly loses almost all of his online games. It's only natural, the best players of their time have a habit of losing online matches all the time, was the same with moon and sky.
Which only means you got no point and no clue. 40%, 60% do you even understand what I said?
hahahah LOOOL habit of losing?I will not spend any of my energy on typing in order to argue with ya and explaining you stuff that everyone see cause it is "in youre nature" not to agree right?hahahah LOL
StarStalker wrote:
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
partner0 wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
...and this shows that you are ignorant,arrogant ,clueless moron since 40% indeed isnt equal to 60% and since both FoV and Fly were in Chine at the time of the match with equal ping and equal conditions...no words needed anymoreI dont know where "Chine" is (unless embed french words into English sentences) but neither of these player were there. Fly was in China, while FoV was in Korea.
Sorry,Ive made a mistake,its China...nope,Im pretty sure they were both in China according to host and specs
They maybe had a good host, but that doesn't change that Fly loses almost all of his online games. It's only natural, the best players of their time have a habit of losing online matches all the time, was the same with moon and sky.
Which only means you got no point and no clue. 40%, 60% do you even understand what I said?
hahahah LOOOL habit of losing?I will not spend any of my energy on typing in order to argue with ya and explaining you stuff that everyone see cause it is "in youre nature" not to agree right?hahahah LOL
Yes idiot he's right. That means saving yourself and give 100% and outclass others when the stakes is much bigger. It's no coincidence that Fly looses Shadow League in group stage while Winning IEF / Extreme masters / 2nd WCG giving him 1st spot on earnings this year...
StarStalker wrote:
FunPlayer wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
partner0 wrote:
StarStalker wrote:
...and this shows that you are ignorant,arrogant ,clueless moron since 40% indeed isnt equal to 60% and since both FoV and Fly were in Chine at the time of the match with equal ping and equal conditions...no words needed anymoreI dont know where "Chine" is (unless embed french words into English sentences) but neither of these player were there. Fly was in China, while FoV was in Korea.
Sorry,Ive made a mistake,its China...nope,Im pretty sure they were both in China according to host and specs
They maybe had a good host, but that doesn't change that Fly loses almost all of his online games. It's only natural, the best players of their time have a habit of losing online matches all the time, was the same with moon and sky.
Which only means you got no point and no clue. 40%, 60% do you even understand what I said?
hahahah LOOOL habit of losing?I will not spend any of my energy on typing in order to argue with ya and explaining you stuff that everyone see cause it is "in youre nature" not to agree right?hahahah LOL
hahahaha LOL xD bwaahaha etc. yeah, explaining stuff that everybody sees... too bad you're alone with your view and can't back it up against overwhelming evidence. To quote WickedPeon: "gnahahaha hihihihihihi euioeiouaioaioui whahahaha"
I couldnt read all conversation, but if someone says that UD have EVER been even equal wit hOrc, he is a moron. I'm playing UD since 2003 and I never felt like I could win orc easily. usually I must outskill him to win, even more then Human player need to win vs me as UD. This was always most imbalanced match-up in game. Now it's just different kid od MU because Orcs used to play FS+TC and more air to own UD, not they use strat they use vs all races. And Orcs have counter for all UD's units from 2 buildings = barracks and beastiary. Nowadays its impossible to play ghouls since BM own them all with his insane critical strike ratio. Earlier they die from 2 stomps and 1 chain. Other than that, orcs doesent have to expand on t2 since they play BM which is like maphack stealing all creep kills and items while creeping SH to your DK level. When UD became capable for battle they just buy orb and mini expo and game is over because you cant even slow production cuz burrows are too strong that u prolly need 80 pop and focus to kill just one. UD's expo i shardest in game and very expensive since u have to build Necropolis and gold mine + 5 acos, and that without acos costs a lot, also u need 2 towers cuz BM will kill acos in a 2 secs if not. So blizzard have to wonder a little of balance of this game because there are many users of it. What about spending 8 mana points for every critical like they did with incinerate to FL?
LegendaryLover wrote:
http://tft.replayers.com/download.php?id=138473&t=12595142544 Claw Dropped + 1 tome of XP. Epicness revealed
that doesnt make him the best player lawl, that says he has luck ;p in finding items ^^
Can someone here post an argument without calling others noobs/morons or,my personal favorite,retards?What the hell is wrong with you ppl?If you think someone is wrong:just prove it with facts and stay calm
gwt_ds_carw wrote:
Can someone here post an argument without calling others noobs/morons or,my personal favorite,retards?What the hell is wrong with you ppl?If you think someone is wrong:just prove it with facts and stay calmI love "moron" more. Retard is not bad thou.
gwt_ds_carw wrote:
Can someone here post an argument without calling others noobs/morons or,my personal favorite,retards?What the hell is wrong with you ppl?If you think someone is wrong:just prove it with facts and stay calmDoesn't make sense, cause I stay calm and use facts to prove that other people are retarded noobs.
FunPlayer wrote:
gwt_ds_carw wrote:
Can someone here post an argument without calling others noobs/morons or,my personal favorite,retards?What the hell is wrong with you ppl?If you think someone is wrong:just prove it with facts and stay calmDoesn't make sense, cause I stay calm and use facts to prove that other people are retarded noobs.
Oh well...At least I tried...I stand corrected
well... first of all, mr StarStalker I dont think you have any point at all. So what, you dont claim anymore that bm is the main reason for orc>ud but just that it is more imba now? Well bm is strong and nobody is claiming that it's not, but in UD vs Orc the problem doesnt come down to BM. As I already said and others did too , Orc never had a problem dealing with UD army, BM isnt needed in this match up to still favor orc enough on all maps vs ud. BM is strong vs UD just as strong as vs any other race, so u must be the failed retard to argue for something that is obvious ~
this is about viOlet not Orc vs UD but ok :D
« Previous1Next »














