Forum > General
Why AMD and not Intel??SeFo

Hi, everyone knows that the new Headsponsor of SK-Gaming is now AMD. Why do you think SK came to such a choice? What do you think about the choice?

Written by SeFo 4 months ago

Comments

« Previous1Next »
+2 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
AMD need to get into the esports because this past times they are blasted by INTEL and the gamers don't choose any more them.

soz bad English.
+2 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
more money, better hardware

intel not showing any more interest?

we will never know
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
I think AMD is better than Intel :)
+0 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
ati=amd
+0 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
wrong reply TT, was for AspheXscorpion
intel is represented in all eSport activitys: Electronic Sports League, 4Kings, n!faculty and so on.
Where is AMD? :D
I think it was a good choice from SK Gaming and AMD to represent AMD more in the eSport Scene.
+2 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
umm Sorry 4kings don't have Intel anymore :P
+2 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
true :P
Actually, 4K is still sponsored by Intel, its not his main sponsor, but Intel still supports 4K...
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
better choice than intel thats why ;)
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
omg lets all go buy AMD :P

im already have AMD anyway :D

bring back insiderrrrrr
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
smarter choice..
It's not about who the better chip manufacturer is, it's about business, money, opportunity. AMD's offer has probably been better than Intel's, that's why they are the new main-sponsor. Simple. We will never know for sure though, if there existed an offer from Intel and they got outbid by AMD, or if they decided to quit the partnership for whatever reasons.
-1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
Intel is much more powerful
Lets say, Q6600 Vs the all amd? omg , i don't think AMD survives.
i'm pretty sure you don't need a Q6600 to play cs1.6 or wc3.
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
in this case its never what you NEED... its always what you CAN have...
amd + ati's spider platform = cool :D
but im an intel user and personally prefer them over amd, but i recon amd will probably dominate in the future
+0 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
AMD tries harder for customers and works smarter than Intel.

Intel has been technologically behind AMD for 5 years and its just beginning to show - when 64 bit games come to the fore AMD will be a clear winner.

AMD+ATI = even smarter choice(s) and with a little help from its friends Linux will be the next gamers O/S - free software for all.

visit http://futursoftinc.com for more info'

+4 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
i read a lot of stupidity...

The fact is that AMD is now the Head Sponsor for 1 reason : the money.

Intel is a bigger firm that AMD (they lost more that 500M $ in 2007 with the buy which was overevalued plus their product which came LATE... phenom?)

If AMD want to back on track, they have to be present to back up some market part and sponsoring the most well know organisation of GAMING is a good way to do.

This is not a question of product themselve...
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
ATI + Linux
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
sadface.
+2 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
its gotta have something to do with SK's partnership with ATi. That and i'm sure AMD can afford to supply SK with anything intel had done previously.
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
the slogan "better choice" made them do it =/
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
the slogan "better choice" made them do it =/
+3 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
Amd prices have dropped by 40 percent compared to intel. A 2.2 duel core on newegg retail box amd is $52. Intel 2.2 Duel retail is 124.99 big price diff. Now granted intels has more cache and has been benched a little bit better than amd's. Look at the price you cant beat it.
Dont listen to these people that say there is a huge diff. there isnt. I own both amd and intel processors both are great at what they do and the only way you will notice a diff. is with benchmarks.
cya
Ever thought it had something to do with the fact that AMD now own ATi?

:)
col2 I'll think you'll find INTEL CPU's are more advanced then AMD's technolically nowadays.

AMD are no longer the ideal CPU for gamers especially. I still use one only cause they are cheap :P
Money wasnt concern when I bought my new PC 9 months ago. First I tought of buying AMD cos my brothers had said years ago that is better than Intel.. but then my friend gladly said Intel is better now. I first doubted my friend a bit but then checked few benchmarks, and the results were amayzing. And thats why Im now broud owner of Core 2 Duo Intel. :)
without intel, amd wouldn't survive! but without concurencies, intel wouldn't developes better chips!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Micro_Devices
read about the histories.
but a sponsorship with amd is a good choice, because amd has more experience with it.
like Scuderia Ferrari motorsports etc. :D http://www.amdmotorsports.com/
+2 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
intel has way better products and AMD is WAY behind them in terms of sales and technological progress...

anyways, money money money :]
Its progress of sience. With 2 firms to compete there is good prices for us costumers. I like to think they are like competing brothers who honor each other but want to do their thing in their own way. :)
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
i have amd
i have intel
intel > amd
nvidia > ati
razer > steelserie
nike > adidas
Thermaltake > coolermaster
corsair > kingston
+3 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
I believe Alex Mueller addresses that in an interview that we will put up next week on SK Gaming. Stay tuned.
dont know maybe AMD give more money but Intel have better hardware
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
i was feeling piety for amd i hope they will grow again now
+1 thumbs Thumb Down Thumb Up
It's true, you should not use Q6600 to CS, just amd.
Q6600 is 4 cores! So its should be used to set up servers and like that.

But still AMD is very good.
Even Intel.
« Previous1Next »
You are not logged in.