Forum > General
best mouse to cs?
for my 1.1 and 3.0 :P !!! ¿ and you ? =P
Comments
+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+1 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+1 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+4 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+4 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+3 thumbs

-1 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+4 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+2 thumbs

The best mouse is whicj fits your hand the best and is comfortable.
+2 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+5 thumbs

+1 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

IME 1.1 SS and IME 3.0 OLD
+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+2 thumbs

-1 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+2 thumbs

MS 3.0 definitly!
Best comfort, best performance and it never bugged a single move!
I wonder about those mx users, too @ stegerson. I think nearly nobody who was ever good at cs 1.6 and played with a ms 1.1 or 3.0 will ever switch to a more expansive mouse just because the performance won't raise and those old mices show why more DPI don't have any advantage.
In my old BF2 clan, several players used MX mices but they just always got the new hardware stuff and weren't even good xD
They got the few frags and thought that vehicles were so cool and so while I thought that they suck at public ^^ So they played with nearly max details and I played on 800x600 or something like that with all details low, like I do with the CS resolution and they always kept asking me how I could play with that but also told the low details/now shadows etc cheat like cause it's so easy to spot the enemy (you don't even see most grass with that) :>
So to me it seems that ppl who buy these expansive mouses just have too much money and don't focus on the performance but think that more expansive stuff will rock for gaming, like more expansive hardware does for better graphics and so on.
Especially maybe some guys who really focus on a single game and got their preference, like some wc3 pros with their razer mouses.
Best comfort, best performance and it never bugged a single move!
I wonder about those mx users, too @ stegerson. I think nearly nobody who was ever good at cs 1.6 and played with a ms 1.1 or 3.0 will ever switch to a more expansive mouse just because the performance won't raise and those old mices show why more DPI don't have any advantage.
In my old BF2 clan, several players used MX mices but they just always got the new hardware stuff and weren't even good xD
They got the few frags and thought that vehicles were so cool and so while I thought that they suck at public ^^ So they played with nearly max details and I played on 800x600 or something like that with all details low, like I do with the CS resolution and they always kept asking me how I could play with that but also told the low details/now shadows etc cheat like cause it's so easy to spot the enemy (you don't even see most grass with that) :>
So to me it seems that ppl who buy these expansive mouses just have too much money and don't focus on the performance but think that more expansive stuff will rock for gaming, like more expansive hardware does for better graphics and so on.
Especially maybe some guys who really focus on a single game and got their preference, like some wc3 pros with their razer mouses.
+3 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+3 thumbs

+2 thumbs

+3 thumbs 






























































