NEWS
Blizzard clashes with Valve over DoTA trademark
Blizzard's Rod Parto told Eurogamer.net that he was confused by Valve's attempts to copyright "DOTA."
By Michael 'Zechs' Radford
Oct 26, 2010 04:25
Blizzard's Rod Parto told Eurogamer.net that he was confused by Valve's attempts to copyright "DOTA."In an interview with gaming website Euro Gamer, Rob Pardo of Blizzard said he was confused by Valve's recent move to trademark DoTA. "To us, that means that you're really taking it away from the Blizzard and Warcraft III community."
Valve is currently working on Defence of The Ancients 2 and applied for a trademark registration for the DoTA name earlier this year. But Blizzard, who released information about their own DoTA mod for Starcraft II at Blizzcon this past weekend, are not happy. "DOTA came out of the Blizzard community," said Pardo. "It just seems a really strange move to us that Valve would go off and try to exclusively trademark the term considering it's something that's been freely available to us and everyone in the Warcraft III community up to this point."
Blizzard is apparently willing to fight their corner if it comes to it: "Our response is that they don't own the term DOTA at this point," he said. "Our contention is that it should continue to be available to Blizzard and to our community."
Source: Euro Gamer via Game Politics
Valve is currently working on Defence of The Ancients 2 and applied for a trademark registration for the DoTA name earlier this year. But Blizzard, who released information about their own DoTA mod for Starcraft II at Blizzcon this past weekend, are not happy. "DOTA came out of the Blizzard community," said Pardo. "It just seems a really strange move to us that Valve would go off and try to exclusively trademark the term considering it's something that's been freely available to us and everyone in the Warcraft III community up to this point."
Blizzard is apparently willing to fight their corner if it comes to it: "Our response is that they don't own the term DOTA at this point," he said. "Our contention is that it should continue to be available to Blizzard and to our community."
Source: Euro Gamer via Game Politics
RELATED NEWS
37 comments
Loading comments...


As for the article itself and it's subject, I don't think Blizzard owns the DoTA name entirely. I'm not sure how all of it works, but it seems that they just don't want Valve to use the name DoTA, so Valve and Icefrogs' version of DoTA will be coming out, but it may be under a different name.
DoTA is wrong because that is NOT the way the publisher/creator has decided to shorten it. It is a very simple concept.
It seems as though Blizzard is pretty calm about this matter, since Valve and them have good relations. As Chris Sigaty says, I wouldn't be too worried about it.
http://kotaku.com/5672493/valve-checking-out-blizzard
I see both Valve and Blizzard handling the situation so that both parties are happy. Unless Activision steps in and goes Bobby Kotick mode with their lawyers. Even if they do Valve will win cus they got Gabe N.
On another note, they don't care if valve makes a dota game, they just dont want valve to trademark dota as their own game. If I understand correctly, if valve makes a game and calls it something else, blizzard has no problem with that. Look at hon and lol, based on dota, hon is even using the same heroes and map but blizzard has absolutely no problem with it.
"All in all, it was fun after a few games and would be a nice casual SCII map for people not wanting to play anything more than casual HoN, but it needs a lot of work of course. At the Pro-Gamer after party, one of the Blizzard developers recognized my name from DotA and told me that they plan on working a lot on the mod, and making it a fun, crisp, and casual map for SCII and didn't have plans beyond that. They don't plan to compete with DotA2, HoN, LoL and whatever else might come out."
So yeah, I wouldn't worry too much.
were* Blizzard.
Sigh, kids these days, don't understand shit about grammar.
Edit: Shit, article header typo roflolmao