Top navigation Players Awards Media Partners About
Change skin White Black
Partners
Time:   19:39:16 CET   10:39:16 PST   13:39:16 EST   03:39:16 Seoul   02:39:16 Beijing

NEWS
TheSlaSH talks to fragbite about the G7

By Duncan 'Thorin' Shields
Dec 3, 2009 05:19


ImageTheSlaSH, Managing Director of SK Gaming, spoke to fragbite about the G7 in an interview which covered a variety of topics that have been on people's minds.



Managing Director of SK Gaming Alexander "TheSlaSH" Müller has been interviewed by fragbite about the G7 federation, which he represents as a spokesperson. The interview addresses a number of community concerns and rumours as well as allowing TheSlaSH the opportunity to explain more of how the G7 operates.

Asked if he agrees that the G7 have done little except "standard contracts, boycotting CPL and publishing statements" TheSlaSH answers:

"I do and I don't.

It is part of the concept that sometimes you can't see our work. Some fights or discussions stay behind closed curtains and all you see is A result. With respect to the process we don't walk around saying we did this and we did that. We rather keep discussions to ourselves sometimes just because it works better for all sides involved.

We did settle player transfer arguments in the past. We did work with organizers on a better distribution of prize money (some of it is being used to have a dedicated travel budget for smaller teams that could not afford to travel to an event if it wasn't for this budget) and many more.

The community tends to underestimate the whole process of unsolved prize money issues. Of course you read feedback here and there in forums, but getting far more than 100 mails on the topic, reading all of them, creating a list, approaching the organizers in a professional way, following up on them and working on the consequences, that is a lot of work. You will have to understand that G7 does not have to do this. Usually if the bigger teams knocked the doors of organizers, they reacted and worked with us. This here is different, this is not for G7, this is for all players that are missing money. It is probably the largest "protest" our community has ever seen so far."


Addressing why Team3D remained in the top 10 of the ranking despite no longer playing Counter-Strike he explained:

"Quite simple. One of the key facts of this ranking is that it has a long term approach. Teams that have been successful lose points slowly over time. The reason is simple. We want to show which brands did a good job over time. So even if fnatic would only place 3-5 in tournaments 2010, it would still be quite a challenge to get pass them for lower seeded teams because fnatic had such strong years now. So 3D was basically ranked on a ballance from the past and the present. That is the reason. Again, it is one of the arguments we wanted to see in the ranking. Show long term good work of organizations with their teams.

The ranking does not say "this is the best team right now". such a ranking would be determined by each and every tournament at any given point of time. The G7 ranking is more complex than that. I hope my answer made it a little clearer. I also hope people go to the G7 website and look up the rules and mechanics this ranking works under."


The G7 is a federation made up of seven members: Evil Geniuses, SK Gaming, fnatic, compLexity, MiBR, Mousesports and Craig Levine (previously of Team3D)

Source: fragbite


RELATED NEWS

15 comments


Loading comments...


Partners