the strategies u call as 'standart' was created by these pro gamers which has been top for many years. and if i am right you aren't any more innovative than your lil bro otherwords don't talk trash when you are the one who isin't innovative )

He's done a lot of the elf race in terms of new strats.

he player potm first against sky or infi and towering with mass hunts t1

SoJu who won WCG winning against everybody using AoW creep and making it popular by that? Stop saying that somebody invented something and other one didn't. Every and each player contributed something to W3 scene and you should be thankful to all of them for making the game it is today.

ReMinD was always the player who used solid strategies and was the alter-ego of insane Moon. When you wanted to play careful WarCraft, you looked up to ReMinD and when you wanted to be nuts, you watched Moon's play.

he won ESWC not WCG

The truth is that you eventually come to playing the same as pros do because they were playing this game forever and I wonder if you could find a better build or more effective strategy than they are using. Other thing is the fact that it is a STRATEGY game where you HAVE to think. If you copy the build without asking why, you will lose most of the time.

Sure, you can be cool playing your own way. But my question is: do you flame a lot about other people playing cookie-cutter strats and still winning? If not, you are my idol and I would love to see you playing.

I am playing seriously for around 1 year at wc3, I was skilled as a level 25 1on1 before, and before reset I was level 42 or so. I played around 1 000 solo games during this year. I don't think you can become that good so fast if you copy only pro strats, for 2 reasons.
The first is that it is very long and painful to assimilate all the knowledge of the pros in a so short period, because there is a lot of work behind those standards strategies. And because there is a lot of work behind those strategies, even if you are brainful, which is strangely uncommon among wc3 players, you can't understand them as good as the pros do, so that with the same strategies you are so less efficient than the pros...
The second reason is that when you play your own style of strategies and makes those ones by yourself, you will understand your strategies much better, so that when you face a new situation, you will be able to use ur brain to adaptate yourself to this situation, whereas when you are copying a strat from another player, if you face another strategy that you never faced, you will be overbrained and lose ;)
By the way, this is a RTS, and even if match ups seems to be balanced by the imbalance of each race, there is still some strategy in that game. Lots of top players like Moon, Check, Remind, Infi, Sky, Grubby, TeD, etc... are still innovating even if standards strategies looks overpowered and are played nearly systematically. But also players like Satiini, Myth, or even lower players like Axslav are able to use their brain. Axslav is well known at wc3 but his micro is quite low, it's the same about StrifeCro, but look how they are strong in 2v2. I still remember one of their weird strategies, Axslav used his 5 first peasants to tower rush WhO and him & strifecro finally won this way xD

Well innovation in micro is at the same time an innovation in tactic wouldn't you say? Otherwise his micro would just be as brainless as most average players.