NEWS
The Zechs Files: MYM is Biased (and so are we)
Bias. It's everywhere. But is that such a bad thing? The Zechs Files thinks not, and will tell you why - in the author's opinion, of course.
By Michael 'Zechs' Radford
Sep 30, 2008 06:02
Bias. It's everywhere. But is that such a bad thing? The Zechs Files thinks not, and will tell you why - in the author's opinion, of course.“Over the last year alone, Gordon Brown and his cronies have added an extra £37,000 to our lifetime tax bill, says the TaxPayers’ Alliance.”
The number one rule of journalism – or writing of any kind – is rope your readers in with the first paragraph. This week’s Zechs Files is indebted to that paragon of journalistic integrity, The Daily Star, for its introduction.
Bias, ladies and gentlemen, is rife. Frankly, the use of the word ‘cronies’ is rather lightweight by comparison to the usual Daily Star standard but it gets the point across: newspapers are not impartial.
One thing I get sick of reading in the comments of every other column is lazy accusations of bias. Ignoring the fact that most of them are incorrect, they rather miss the point. Print news is biased. It just is. There is no getting away from it.
Boring
But is that really such a bad thing? Impartiality would be wonderful in an ideal world but it would be rather boring, wouldn’t it? Columns like this would disappear (I know, I know, I walked into that one) and we would be left with only the simplest of newsposts.
Take this story for example. It could easily have been made shorter, less opinionated and, in retrospect, it probably should have been. However, writing fulfils more roles in our lives than merely telling us what is going on.
The job of an article writer and especially a columnist, is to entertain you, the reader. Imagine a completely impartial version of this column, for instance. It's almost impossible. Columns are entirely personal - even moreso than an article, which at least requires some level of research and/or evidence to back-up the opinions. Note, though, that even a well researched article will express opinions.
Responsibility
Of course, there is a level of responsibility that comes with any public position, but there a couple of things to bear in mind. Firstly, keeping something strictly impartial is rather difficult. Going back to the DotA piece, even the introduction offers an opinion: “noticeably absent is staple esport favourite, Warcraft III.” It seems innocent enough, but if you want to get really nit-picky ‘favourite’ is very much a matter of opinion.
Secondly, very, very few esports writers are paid for what they do. One of the few perks of the “job” (and I use the term loosely) is being able to give your own opinions a public voice. Excuse or reason? I’ll let you decide, but the fact remains that impartiality is much easier to achieve when writers are practically paid to shut up. [1]
See-through
Even if I haven’t managed to convince you that a small amount of bias is favourable then surely you have to admit that it’s not so bad if you know where we stand. Of course SK is going to write favourably about SK players, just like any other clan site you care to name. You expect it, just like a Daily Star reader expects its political commentators to support The Conservatives. It’s all about one of evan’s favourite words: transparency.
You don’t go to GotForums expecting them to slate MLG (although employing CGS staff members to write about the league’s competitors is a different matter altogether) and you don’t go to MYM expecting them to say ‘Grubby got owned’.
If you want to simplify this column absolutely, I suppose my main point is that no, gaming sites are not impartial, but that it’s okay if you know it in the first place. And as a footnote, the so-called bias is what makes sites like SK and MYM so interesting.
Another important thing to note is that, given the way esports works, 'exclusives' are incredibly rare. Most of our news comes from press releases or other websites. If there were no opinion pieces then every esports site would be identical, give or take a few adjectives.
Don't believe me? Why do you think GotForums gets most of its hits from its forums? Because they have so little comment content. By comparison, the forums on SK are less active but our columns bring in a lot of hits precisely because of the fact that they offer comment and opinion, not despite it.
[1]The word ‘practically’ is very important here!
The number one rule of journalism – or writing of any kind – is rope your readers in with the first paragraph. This week’s Zechs Files is indebted to that paragon of journalistic integrity, The Daily Star, for its introduction.
Bias, ladies and gentlemen, is rife. Frankly, the use of the word ‘cronies’ is rather lightweight by comparison to the usual Daily Star standard but it gets the point across: newspapers are not impartial.
One thing I get sick of reading in the comments of every other column is lazy accusations of bias. Ignoring the fact that most of them are incorrect, they rather miss the point. Print news is biased. It just is. There is no getting away from it.
Boring
But is that really such a bad thing? Impartiality would be wonderful in an ideal world but it would be rather boring, wouldn’t it? Columns like this would disappear (I know, I know, I walked into that one) and we would be left with only the simplest of newsposts.
Take this story for example. It could easily have been made shorter, less opinionated and, in retrospect, it probably should have been. However, writing fulfils more roles in our lives than merely telling us what is going on.
The job of an article writer and especially a columnist, is to entertain you, the reader. Imagine a completely impartial version of this column, for instance. It's almost impossible. Columns are entirely personal - even moreso than an article, which at least requires some level of research and/or evidence to back-up the opinions. Note, though, that even a well researched article will express opinions.
Responsibility
Of course, there is a level of responsibility that comes with any public position, but there a couple of things to bear in mind. Firstly, keeping something strictly impartial is rather difficult. Going back to the DotA piece, even the introduction offers an opinion: “noticeably absent is staple esport favourite, Warcraft III.” It seems innocent enough, but if you want to get really nit-picky ‘favourite’ is very much a matter of opinion.
Secondly, very, very few esports writers are paid for what they do. One of the few perks of the “job” (and I use the term loosely) is being able to give your own opinions a public voice. Excuse or reason? I’ll let you decide, but the fact remains that impartiality is much easier to achieve when writers are practically paid to shut up. [1]
See-through
Even if I haven’t managed to convince you that a small amount of bias is favourable then surely you have to admit that it’s not so bad if you know where we stand. Of course SK is going to write favourably about SK players, just like any other clan site you care to name. You expect it, just like a Daily Star reader expects its political commentators to support The Conservatives. It’s all about one of evan’s favourite words: transparency.
You don’t go to GotForums expecting them to slate MLG (although employing CGS staff members to write about the league’s competitors is a different matter altogether) and you don’t go to MYM expecting them to say ‘Grubby got owned’.
If you want to simplify this column absolutely, I suppose my main point is that no, gaming sites are not impartial, but that it’s okay if you know it in the first place. And as a footnote, the so-called bias is what makes sites like SK and MYM so interesting.
Another important thing to note is that, given the way esports works, 'exclusives' are incredibly rare. Most of our news comes from press releases or other websites. If there were no opinion pieces then every esports site would be identical, give or take a few adjectives.
Don't believe me? Why do you think GotForums gets most of its hits from its forums? Because they have so little comment content. By comparison, the forums on SK are less active but our columns bring in a lot of hits precisely because of the fact that they offer comment and opinion, not despite it.
[1]The word ‘practically’ is very important here!
RELATED NEWS
36 comments
Loading comments...


Ye we cool.
"the so-called bias is what makes sites like SK and MYM so interesting"
You betcha
When we talk about player transfer and stuff like that...yes. But when there is some events live, like WCG, ESWC, EM and similar and when there is SK, MYM, etc.. journalist this is not true. Also, if news writers can follow match live (hltv) and they can when there is a big event they are writing own news and not copy from other sites.
When we are talking about impartiality, it is true. And to be honest, I do not expect from SK news writer to say SK got owned, just like you said. This would be abnormal for me.
Anyway, great column, I enjoyed reading.
The Times headline for a Champions league match yesterday was - "Celtic succumb to travel bug again as Senna provides the decisive touch of class". Celtic lost but the news was still spun to make them out as the significant party. The actual space used for the news was barely 200 words, if that. Compare that to a full page for Arsenals win, and almost three pages for Manchester United.
Wishful thinking, eh? :P
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/1306/readmorent8.png
SK is way more subtle that I could not call such articles propaganda, but you news writers know how to put some subliminal advertisings in your posts.
edit : sorry did not use the reply function
MYM is spreading "propaganda" with their silly articles that they love to publish, like PpG's ones. Why is it propaganda to me ? cause MYM is using the couple Grubby/PpG to increase their hits and fame. And I don't talk about those thousands of ridiculous articles where you can find the place to download a MYM wallpaper signed by Grubby or whatever shit this is.
What I'm saying is, it may not sound as propaganda, but when you think about those """articles""", they way they are written, what its told in them and the moment they do publish them, its way more than some random self advertising.
It could be interesting to bring up the bias vs. unbias discussion in terms of what is preferrable in our niche-community. And it is very few sites which are unbiased, readmore is for example biased towards Germans, while GGL (when Carmac was there), seemed to be somewhat biased towards his interests (players/games).
I'm not sure if a state of 100% unbias is where we want to go, but that's just my oppinion.
if u for example look at gameriot's now probably infamous NihilumHydra
i mean evryone knows he s just a random troll impersonating a famous wow palyer (yet he just seems not to get banned for some reason) but the way he trolls is soooooooooooo good that ppl are roflmaoing all over the place reading his blogs (and that includes me)
This is also the reason why I have my grudges against certain pages, although I can't blame them for doing what they do. ~.~
People are lazy and believe in the power of irony. It means they can find excuses to dismiss legitimate opinions. If Carmac had published his column about MYM distorting the WC3 community with inflated salaries on Gotfrag, there would be no problem. But, because it was published on SK, it's seen as propaganda or an attack on MYM.
In the long run there's no "hope" for team websites. We simply have to believe that Gotfrag and readmore etc will do the job they're supposed to, eventually. After all, I go to the BBC website to read my football news not manutd.com.
I don't think Gotfrag is inhibited or influenced by MLG to be honest. Unless the decline of Gotfrag is caused by them penny pinching. It has more to do with lazy staff and a poor recruitment policy. Though, you obviously know more than me about Gotfrag.
In fact, you look at most of the (CGS) general managers and they've had years worth of experience with traditional eSports. BSL may be abusing his position but he does have experience and there's nothing wrong with highlighting a legitimate point.
If he's being shameless about it then that's his choice. We both know that could go horribly wrong for the CGS and Gotfrag. But, Gotfrag obviously trust him and the CGS isn't going to ask one of its employees to stop promoting the league. Especially when the point is legitimate and advantageous compared with the competition; the ESWC in this case.
Both Malystryx and Carmac have worked for the ESL. Carmac also worked with EA not too long ago. Some of the fnatic general managers were running/working with QuadV and the ESL as well. It's just how things are at the moment.
Even if article writing, doing columns and writing news seems "so easy", so many people have the wrong idea of it and think that even getting a negative reaction is still a type of reaction that gets the clicks needed. Newsflash: revolting your readers isn't something positive!
Over the last couple of years as a regular reader of SK I have to say there has been a MASSIVE improvement to news staff. (Ok ok..fair enough, _some_ mistakes have been made with who you hired but you live and learn right?) In particular from the old website where news was objective but boring. Now it's slightly harder to find just the thing you wanted to know but you've made the reading through the text to get to the bit you wanted alot more interesting.
It's not only with gaming websites though. This whole W3 thing has made amateurs popular and profesionals immitate amateurs. It has now become "acceptable" and even "recommended" to use simple blogs as website, pictures you made yourself with a crap camera as picture material, and someone with no experience as newsreader for a "fresh feeling".
Soon there will be a conflict with this (im talking in years) and it will be profesional again to be clear and objective only. We posters have a temporary voice, so use it all you can, positively.
The "amateurism" is due to money. It has nothing to do with promoting something fresh, quick or home made. Let's ignore the fact that 99.999% of journalists within eSports have had no formal training or education to do their job. Do you know how much a decent camera or microphone costs? I'm not even going to mention video because that's out of almost everyone's capabilities.
Despite the fact there's generally little or no post-editing (on any content whether written, sound or video), it's better to have your own content than use and source others (in principle). It's a Catch22 situation. It's not really worth sending people, who're generally unqualified or have poor equipment, to events financially. But, you're (as an organisation) unlikely (or unable) to pay for their training or equipment. So they can't get better but you've to send them, and the cycle continues.
I would stop using the words objectivity and professionalism when you talk about journalism, eSports especially. They're abstract and meaningless.
eSports journalism is no doubt something you cannot live your life with, but during this time you can learn from your mistakes made which you will not be allowed to make once you are in the professional world. I think it's highly beneficial in every way and treating it as a professional will only increase the benefices and outcome of it. Those who treat it as a hobby should stick to blogs and websites who don't count on clicks.
You say that writers should treat eSports as professional as possible. Which is a fine idea itself. But, where do they get their idea of professionalism from? Certainly not from the industry at the moment (for reasons I mentioned before). Unless they're an English or journalism student how are they supposed to pick up and improve upon the behaviour/skills which you say we need.
I think you're moralising a little too much and your idea of professionalism is more to do with respect, not being overly controversial, trying to remain objective and directly benefit the industry (providing what the readers want). You see anything which goes against this idea as detrimental to the industry as a whole.
Sometimes it's not possible to be formally objective (it's a fallacy anyway) and I think you believe there should only be a limited number of styles. I'd be surprised if you found any examples of me personally “demeaning or insulting” someone directly. If I did it would probably be with a decent argument or proof to justify why I hold that opinion. It doesn't matter if I'm wrong because it's more important for journalists to be accountable than right.
Even then, it's only my style. The editor and boss (Carmac and bds in this example, and gosey before that) knew and promoted my style (even after 'we' separated) on numerous occasions. It works well for certain topics and it's popular I assure you, the two most popular columns on SK are mine.
Sometimes I did make mistakes and was a little rash. But, I know this myself. I've a pretty high threshold when it comes to whine and criticism (in eSports) but I do listen. And, as you said, “during this time you can learn from your mistakes made which you will not be allowed to make once you are in the professional world.”!
(If you read anything I've written outside of eSports you'd think I was a completely different person!)