Time: 01:28:39 CET 16:28:39 PST 19:28:39 EST 08:28:39 Seoul 07:28:39 Beijing
BLOGS
Apollo missions bullshit?
By Marc 'Th3Alchemist' Soler
Feb 1, 2006 00:37
All we know, that on May 1961, John F. Kennedy promessed to the american people that they will put the man on the moon...
...All we know, that on the 20th June of 1969, Neil Armstrong steped on the moon and the entire world made a party...
All we know, they came back easily with some rocks of it which couldn't got shown to the public...
Now the questions is, did it really happen like NASA says?
In 1963 they sent the 1st american to the space... It tooks only 6 years to send one to the moon, land there and coming back?
Here are some true facts:
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo11/med/as11_40_5874.jpg]No stars on the sky?
Without the presents of atmosphere, the lights of the stars are more "strong" to view, why can't we see any star on the pictures taken there?[/url]
This is a well know image of the clip where Neil put the 1st time the foot on the moon... How did this camera went there and get pointed to the stairs?
The soil of the moon is a strong reflector of the sunshines, but why on this picture, only the soil where the module and the astronaut are is reflected?
The camera they've used, as they took lot's of images on the moon, is expected to be small and portable. The negative on a film role is very sensitive, it can support more or less than 50ºC, or the negative ruins the photos which were taken. But on the moon, the temperature reaches 450º celsius. Do you belive there was that technology to make these negatives so resistant? (Not forgetting the quality of the images on such a portable instrument...)
Ok... what wrong with this image? Oh yes... See these black crosses on this photo? It helps to know he dimension of the rocks on the photos... These crosses make parte of the lens oh the camera, but if you look carefully to the second cross (near the sender of thar rover) it shows that the cross goes behind the sender... rotfl
If you can't see it well, here is a bigger picture (2 MB):
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo16/hires/as16-107-17446.jpg
[url=http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo16/html/as16-106-17340.html
There are a lot more evidences that this maybe bullshit...
...All we know, that on the 20th June of 1969, Neil Armstrong steped on the moon and the entire world made a party...
All we know, they came back easily with some rocks of it which couldn't got shown to the public...
Now the questions is, did it really happen like NASA says?
In 1963 they sent the 1st american to the space... It tooks only 6 years to send one to the moon, land there and coming back?
Here are some true facts:
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo11/med/as11_40_5874.jpg]No stars on the sky?
Without the presents of atmosphere, the lights of the stars are more "strong" to view, why can't we see any star on the pictures taken there?[/url]
This is a well know image of the clip where Neil put the 1st time the foot on the moon... How did this camera went there and get pointed to the stairs?
The soil of the moon is a strong reflector of the sunshines, but why on this picture, only the soil where the module and the astronaut are is reflected?
The camera they've used, as they took lot's of images on the moon, is expected to be small and portable. The negative on a film role is very sensitive, it can support more or less than 50ºC, or the negative ruins the photos which were taken. But on the moon, the temperature reaches 450º celsius. Do you belive there was that technology to make these negatives so resistant? (Not forgetting the quality of the images on such a portable instrument...)
Ok... what wrong with this image? Oh yes... See these black crosses on this photo? It helps to know he dimension of the rocks on the photos... These crosses make parte of the lens oh the camera, but if you look carefully to the second cross (near the sender of thar rover) it shows that the cross goes behind the sender... rotfl
If you can't see it well, here is a bigger picture (2 MB):
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo16/hires/as16-107-17446.jpg
[url=http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo16/html/as16-106-17340.html
There are a lot more evidences that this maybe bullshit...
Loading comments...
http://www.sk-gaming.com/rss/blog/Th3Alchemist
http://lepszyswiat.web.cedant.com/filmy/didwelandonthemooncaly.wmv
anyway, NASA plans to go back to the moon in 2018. I guess we will have to start filming again?
but yeah, just thought I'd give a final response to this, if anyone actually has fallen for the conspiracy theorist's stupid ploy..
[url=http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/Take_Off.htm
The speed of today's technology is very fast, but also slow if you see it... It takes 25 minuts to send an info from Mars to Earth.
Light-speed from the earth to moon is between 2,5 - 3 seconds, so if that camera was triggered remotely from Earth by NASA specialists, they should pulled the trigger as they seeing the module lift off with a good reflex... OK fine, but...
If the specialist would see the module lift off, in real fact, it already lifted off 3 secs ago, so he pulls the trigger and it sends info to camera, arriving 3 sec after it...
Conclusion... If the lift off camera was really triggered remotely from earth, it should be delayed 6 seconds...
(All this imaging that the info transmission was at that time so fast as light speed, which NASA still don't has, and 0.00 sec of reflex)
http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/Mirrors.htm
How can the mirror be so well installed parallel to the scientific station to get the reflex of it? Impossible...
Sorry my english... I hope this makes a point...